Commentüs on: Don’t buy a Compact Digital Camera with more than 6 megapixels http://jumpserve.com/blanco/archives/2007/12/26/dont-buy-a-compact-digital-camera-with-more-than-6-megapixels/ Don't worry, we'll fix it in the mix! Thu, 08 Jan 2009 22:18:35 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7-RC1-10041 hourly 1 By: Dude http://jumpserve.com/blanco/archives/2007/12/26/dont-buy-a-compact-digital-camera-with-more-than-6-megapixels/comment-page-1/#comment-18765 Dude Mon, 15 Sep 2008 16:39:52 +0000 http://jumpserve.com/blanco/archives/2007/12/26/dont-buy-a-compact-digital-camera-with-more-than-6-megapixels/#comment-18765 <p>On the eve of Photokina 2008, your references to 4 year old articles are obsolete. I'd bump your 6MP up to 10MP. Leica / Panasonic have some crazy new cameras that should be looked into.</p> On the eve of Photokina 2008, your references to 4 year old articles are obsolete. I’d bump your 6MP up to 10MP. Leica / Panasonic have some crazy new cameras that should be looked into.

]]> By: blanco http://jumpserve.com/blanco/archives/2007/12/26/dont-buy-a-compact-digital-camera-with-more-than-6-megapixels/comment-page-1/#comment-15207 blanco Fri, 28 Dec 2007 04:49:47 +0000 http://jumpserve.com/blanco/archives/2007/12/26/dont-buy-a-compact-digital-camera-with-more-than-6-megapixels/#comment-15207 <p>Also... this series of articles from 2004 is titled "The Megapixel Myth" as well, I still find them to be useful.</p> <p>Beyond Megapixels - Part I http://www.thetechlounge.com/article/121/</p> <p>Beyond Megapixels - Part II http://www.thetechlounge.com/article/123/</p> <p>Beyond Megapixels - Part III http://www.thetechlounge.com/article/134/</p> Also… this series of articles from 2004 is titled “The Megapixel Myth” as well, I still find them to be useful.

Beyond Megapixels - Part I
http://www.thetechlounge.com/article/121/

Beyond Megapixels - Part II
http://www.thetechlounge.com/article/123/

Beyond Megapixels - Part III
http://www.thetechlounge.com/article/134/

]]> By: blanco http://jumpserve.com/blanco/archives/2007/12/26/dont-buy-a-compact-digital-camera-with-more-than-6-megapixels/comment-page-1/#comment-15203 blanco Fri, 28 Dec 2007 01:43:55 +0000 http://jumpserve.com/blanco/archives/2007/12/26/dont-buy-a-compact-digital-camera-with-more-than-6-megapixels/#comment-15203 <p>Well Dude,</p> <p>You might want to read up on the The Megapixel Myth then. http://www.kenrockwell.com/tech/mpmyth.htm</p> Well Dude,

You might want to read up on the The Megapixel Myth then. http://www.kenrockwell.com/tech/mpmyth.htm

]]> By: Dude http://jumpserve.com/blanco/archives/2007/12/26/dont-buy-a-compact-digital-camera-with-more-than-6-megapixels/comment-page-1/#comment-15199 Dude Thu, 27 Dec 2007 16:58:38 +0000 http://jumpserve.com/blanco/archives/2007/12/26/dont-buy-a-compact-digital-camera-with-more-than-6-megapixels/#comment-15199 <p>I don't know about this. I have a Canon G9 "point & shoot". It has 12.1 Megapixels (1/1.7” sensor) with and has RAW capabilities. The image sharpness and lack of noise are remarkable. Also, it has pro features like aperture priority, shutter speed priority and other features that you'd expect on a DSLR. Have a look at www.dpreview.com and at www.kenrockwell.com for more on the topic. To see my "noisy" +6 MP images go to www.flickr.com/photos/14486602@N08 and take a look at the 1st 9 photos.</p> <p>Dude</p> I don’t know about this. I have a Canon G9 “point & shoot”. It has 12.1 Megapixels (1/1.7” sensor) with and has RAW capabilities. The image sharpness and lack of noise are remarkable. Also, it has pro features like aperture priority, shutter speed priority and other features that you’d expect on a DSLR. Have a look at http://www.dpreview.com and at http://www.kenrockwell.com for more on the topic. To see my “noisy” +6 MP images go to http://www.flickr.com/photos/14486602@N08 and take a look at the 1st 9 photos.

Dude

]]>